A. Environment
- Entry points, counters and interview rooms have clear sightlines; no blind corners where staff work
- Interview and consult rooms have two exits or the staff member sits nearest the door
- Duress alarms are installed at counters and in rooms, tested monthly, and staff know they exist
- Lighting is adequate in car parks, entries and after-hours access routes
- Waiting areas are designed to reduce frustration: seating, queue visibility, estimated waits communicated
- Physical barriers or counter depth protect cash-handling and medication points
B. Work practices
- Opening and closing are done by two people, or by one person with a monitored device and documented procedure
- Cash holdings are minimised and movements varied
- Staffing levels at known peak-aggression times (waits, refusals, evenings) are reviewed against incident data
- Service refusals, evictions and debt conversations follow a script staff are trained on
- Staff can discreetly summon a colleague to any interaction that is deteriorating
C. Client factors
- Client records support risk flags, and flags are visible at the point of service or booking
- Flags carry the reason and required precautions, not just a symbol
- Known triggers (refusals, delays, medication, custody matters) are identified per service line
- High-flag clients are scheduled to double-staffed times, controlled locations, or senior staff
- Flag reviews remove stale entries so the system keeps staff trust
D. Systems and response
- All aggression, including verbal abuse and threats, is reported through a standard form and actually gets reported
- Incident data is reviewed at least quarterly for patterns by site, time and service
- Client-facing staff have current de-escalation training; high-risk teams have refreshers
- A raised alarm gets a defined response in a defined time, tested by drill
- Affected staff receive follow-up and support, and repeat exposure is managed, not normalised
Rating and actions
Any unticked item in sections A or D that relates to alarms, sightlines or response is a priority finding. Record each finding below with an owner and date, and bring the incident data to the review.
Findings: [___]. Priority findings: [___]. Completed by [name] on [date]. Next review: [date].