Honest comparison · reviewed 2026-07-21

Duress vs WorkSafe Guardian.

Two different answers to lone worker safety, compared feature by feature - including where WorkSafe Guardian is genuinely the better choice. Compiled from public vendor materials; product names and trade marks belong to their owners.

Side by side

Feature comparison

Duress WorkSafe Guardian
Head office / primary regions Australia · AU, NZ, UK Australia · national
Hardware devices Falcon (body-worn camera), Phoenix (Bluetooth button), Eagle (4G LTE device) App-first; optional paired Bluetooth duress button
Smartphone safety app Yes - Duress App Yes - WorkSafe Guardian (WSG) app
Body-worn camera with live streaming Yes - Falcon Not advertised
24/7 professional monitoring Yes - accredited 24/7 monitoring centre, included as standard Yes - staffed 24/7 response centre, included
Monitoring accreditation ASIAL A1-graded (AU); ISO 27001:2022 certified ASIAL A1 (AU); ISO 27001:2022 plus 9001, 14001, 45001, 31000
Indoor positioning Yes - BLE beacons (Eagle) Not advertised
Gas detection No Not advertised
Buy online without a sales call Yes - configure and check out Quote / demo-led; free trial, NFP rates

Compiled from each vendor's public websites and documentation. "-" and "not advertised" mean the capability was not claimed in the vendor's public materials at review time; offerings change, so verify current capabilities directly. Spotted an error? Tell us and we'll fix it. Full four-vendor comparison here.

The honest read

Which one is right for you?

When WorkSafe Guardian is the right answer

A strong, credible fit for Australian organisations that want a simple, professionally-monitored lone-worker app with no hardware to manage - community services, healthcare-in-the-home, local government and not-for-profits. It pairs an ASIAL A1-graded 24/7 response centre with an unusually broad certification stack (five ISO standards), and its NFP discounting and Australian-standards framing land well with WHS and procurement teams who want a recognised local response centre and minimal rollout friction. For a phone-only deployment that needs reliable welfare timers, duress alerts and a monitored escalation path, it is a clean choice.

When Duress is the right answer

WorkSafe Guardian is the closest match here - both run accredited 24/7 monitoring graded ASIAL A1 in Australia, and both hold ISO 27001:2022, so this is not a monitoring-quality argument. Duress differs on three specifics: published operator performance (a 7-second median pickup), UK coverage with NSI Gold accreditation for teams operating across regions, and a hardware range - the Falcon body-worn camera with live streaming, the Phoenix Bluetooth card, and the Eagle 4G device with BLE indoor positioning - for roles where a phone app isn't enough. If your teams are Australia-only and phone-based, WorkSafe Guardian is a genuine peer.

Questions

What buyers ask

Both Duress and WorkSafe Guardian hold ASIAL A1 - what's the difference?
On monitoring accreditation, very little - both run accredited 24/7 centres graded ASIAL A1 in Australia, both hold ISO 27001:2022. Duress adds a published 7-second median operator pickup, NSI Gold accreditation for the UK, and a hardware range (body-worn camera, Bluetooth card, 4G device with indoor positioning). WorkSafe Guardian is app-first and Australia-focused.
Can I get a body-worn camera or indoor positioning?
Neither is advertised in WorkSafe Guardian's public materials at review time. Duress offers both - the Falcon body-worn camera and the Eagle device with BLE indoor positioning.
Can I see pricing and buy online with either?
WorkSafe Guardian is demo/quote-led with a free trial. Duress publishes its pricing and supports online checkout in AU, NZ and the UK.

Build your exact configuration and price in two minutes.