Compare · reviewed 2026-07-21
Duress, next to the alternatives.
We compare ourselves honestly against every serious lone worker safety vendor - including where the other option is genuinely the better fit. Each page is compiled from the vendor's public materials, feature by feature. If you spot an error, tell us and we'll fix it.
Duress vs SHEQSY
A capable app-first product with strong scheduling and dashboard features, and a natural choice if your organisation already runs on SafetyCulture.
See the comparison ›Duress vs Blackline
The specialist for industrial and hazardous environments.
See the comparison ›Duress vs Peoplesafe
A long-established UK provider with its own BS 8484-certified alarm receiving centre and a broad range of discreet personal alarms.
See the comparison ›Duress vs SoloProtect
The deepest lone-worker-standards pedigree in the UK, in a discreet form factor.
See the comparison ›Duress vs StaySafe
Fast, hardware-free deployment - and a natural fit if you already run EcoOnline's EHS software.
See the comparison ›Duress vs Ok Alone
The lowest-friction entry in the category for small North American teams.
See the comparison ›Duress vs GetHomeSafe
The strongest fit for remote, out-of-coverage work in New Zealand and Australia - field research, conservation, forestry, survey and utilities crews operating beyond cellular range.
See the comparison ›Duress vs WorkSafe Guardian
A strong, credible fit for Australian organisations that want a simple, professionally-monitored lone-worker app with no hardware to manage - community services, healthcare-in-the-home, local government and not-for-profits.
See the comparison ›Duress vs SafeZone
The standout choice for large, multi-site organisations that run their own 24/7 security operations centre - universities, hospital networks, large corporate and government campuses.
See the comparison ›Prefer everything on one page? See the full multi-vendor comparison, or read the complete lone worker safety guide.